Lenovo 20S00020AU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20S00020AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20S00020AU
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime17.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 12:42
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 200
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 470
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 8
5% 7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256-Q79 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6Q279
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,866
Write 1,427
Mixed 1,352
344% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 67.4
224% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 722
550% 750 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-051.A00G 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback