MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 296%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 312%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics260% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 1100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 12:41
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 204
2-Core 426
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,466
137% 1,142 Pts
64-Core 1,989
123% 1,989 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Nvidia(10DE 17AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3270 MHz, MLim: 6000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Lighting 384
Reflection 369
Parallax 396
313% 383 fps
MRender 495
Gravity 325
Splatting 233
273% 351 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 260%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3525 2028 2044 2086 2028 2145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,996
Write 3,855
Mixed 3,332
SusWrite 2,309
706% 3,123 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 97.8
317% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,805
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1586
1,187% 1,588 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 430%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
374GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15055
Write 13,621
Mixed 14,108
3,184% 14,261 MB/s
4K Read 721
4K Write 474
4K Mixed 538
2,032% 577 MB/s
DQ Read 2,214
DQ Write 1,711
DQ Mixed 1,876
1,427% 1,934 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
MSI M450 1TB
720GB free
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1568 2941 2070 136 147 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,170
Write 3,067
Mixed 1,622
SusWrite 1,172
400% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.5
230% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1,838
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,634
1,170% 1,519 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 255%
Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 481 482 478 482 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 485
Mixed 439
SusWrite 481
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 54.8
182% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
181% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 68.2
186% 65.1 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 80.6
SC Mixed 60.3
185% 64.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 181%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F35 U32J59x
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $2,230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback