Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K553EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K553EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EAN
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210910
Uptime27.9 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 12:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 249
76% 142 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 638
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 21.3
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 28
Splatting 3.3
12% 16.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 217 75 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,083
Write 783
Mixed 746
SusWrite 90
150% 675 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 63.7
218% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 167
206% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 19.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 15.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K553EA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K553EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback