Pcware IPMH410G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware IPMH410G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH410G
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 00:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 227
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 771
75% 617 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.3% Very good
Lighting 87.2
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 80
71% 84.4 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 71.4
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 56 66 66 28 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 450
Write 342
Mixed 256
SusWrite 77.9
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 12
65% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 26.7
34% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
303GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 167
Write 169
Mixed 81
SusWrite 119
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
848GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 123 122 122 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 132
Write 102
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 124
121% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.5" 1280 720 ACR074D KG241Q S
Typical IPMH410G Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH410G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback