TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME H310M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-C  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 21:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,134
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,544
96% 1,544 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑
This bench: 98%
 Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
MSI(1462 8123) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 71.4
61% 73.6 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 57
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 57.1%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 490 491 492 493 492 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 775
Write 619
Mixed 669
SusWrite 491
143% 638 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 67.3
223% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 938
658% 828 MB/s
Poor: 203% ↑
This bench: 165%
 Great: 398%
SSD 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: V1111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 103%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
460GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 188 190 189 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 441
Mixed 440
SusWrite 189
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 50.5
164% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 313
235% 315 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 96.9%
 Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 82.3%
 Great: 133%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3367 HP ENVY 27
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME H310M-C Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-C

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel  $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples18x
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples17x
Core i3-9100FIntel  $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples15x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples14x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples5x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples5x
Flare 60GBPatriotBench 60%, 647 samples4x
RAM
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 2x4GBGEILBench 71%, 172 samples3x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GBKingstonBench 48%, 8,257 samples3x
CM4X8GD3000C16K2 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 16GBCorsairBench 71%, 4 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback