Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M-HDV/M.2
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 20:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 183
2-Core 346
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 981
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,355
84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
ASRock(1849 5324) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 275
Parallax 512
209% 348 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 286
Splatting 273
238% 294 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A231W74A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3182 1208 1209 1214 1229 1229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 3,490
Write 4,070
Mixed 2,504
SusWrite 1,545
652% 2,903 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 63.5
208% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,642
DQ Write 1130
DQ Mixed 1,451
1,065% 1,407 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 360%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-DTLABBK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 57.7
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 62.9
174% 60.9 GB/s
SC Read 52.5
SC Write 64.6
SC Mixed 47.1
156% 54.7 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 167%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM7314 S24C36x
Typical B650M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback