Alienware m16 R1 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive415% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware m16 R1 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0W0K6K
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 17:13
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 201
2-Core 395
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 770
8-Core 1,358
128% 1,064 Pts
64-Core 2,464
152% 2,464 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0BFE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 240
Parallax 252
205% 248 fps
MRender 379
Gravity 225
Splatting 153
195% 252 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 182%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN810 NVMe WDC 1024GB
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61912524 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3510 2433 2510 2592 1998 1560 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 3,166
Write 3,865
Mixed 2,946
SusWrite 2,434
700% 3,103 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 64.6
220% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,815
DQ Write 1,431
DQ Mixed 1,691
1,247% 1,646 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 415%
Great: 567%
Kbg40zns512g NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
103GB free
Firmware: 10410106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 749 846 558 518 530 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 45.2
Write 258
Mixed 320
SusWrite 657
74% 320 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 60
181% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 662
540% 795 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 216%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 116
Write 93.1
Mixed 64
SusWrite 122
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 1
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 5.3
6% 7.55 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 31.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 41.1
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 39
124% 43.3 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 107%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 480 16" 1280 720 CMN161C
Typical m16 R1 AMD Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Alienware m16 R1 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback