Alienware m16 R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware m16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TR9W6
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 06:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 211
2-Core 418
121% 236 Pts
4-Core 784
8-Core 1,299
127% 1,042 Pts
64-Core 3,395
210% 3,395 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0BFC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 12.4
9% 13.3 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 0.1
7% 9.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3607 3598 3376 1893 1331 1350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,728
Mixed 2,167
SusWrite 2,526
562% 2,490 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 89.6
302% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1271
951% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 406%
Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 72.2
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 56.3
169% 59.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 27.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 16" 1280 720 CMN161E
Typical m16 R1 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback