TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 09:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 867
78% 658 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 88.2%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 3731)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 107
Parallax 120
97% 115 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 119
Splatting 104
104% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 99%
 Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 100 97 129 43 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 392
Write 139
Mixed 186
SusWrite 91.6
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 26.2
99% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 88.2
74% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 56.9%
 Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
281GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1191 1161 1204 1087 1103 1068 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,482
Write 2,140
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 1,136
399% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 64.5
208% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 986
745% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑
This bench: 278%
 Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
90GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 99 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 192
Write 180
Mixed 80
SusWrite 97.6
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 83.1%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 84%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 165 27" 2560 1377 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB Builds (Compare 1,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples754x
Core i7-8700KIntel  $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples663x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples239x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples602x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples574x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples101x
SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples185x
Ultimate SU800 1TBAdata  $100Bench 104%, 26,139 samples126x
SU650 240GBAdata  $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples82x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples187x
78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,890 samples172x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples129x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback