Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 08:33
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 179
2-Core 356
113% 210 Pts
4-Core 712
8-Core 1,398
125% 1,055 Pts
64-Core 1787
111% 1787 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 189
Parallax 180
170% 192 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 147
Splatting 126
129% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 145%
Great: 136%
Intel UHD Graphics 750
ASRock(1849 4C8A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 11.2
7% 11.6 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKKW010X7 1TB
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2342 1460 1469 1474 1538 1583 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 4,657
Write 3,803
Mixed 2,901
SusWrite 1,645
725% 3,251 MB/s
4K Read 74.5
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 108
362% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,184
879% 1,171 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 451%
Great: 614%
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
1.5TB free
Firmware: 003C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1811 1807 1778 1768 1812 1568 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,591
Write 1,844
Mixed 1467
SusWrite 1,757
428% 1,915 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 71.8
234% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 755
672% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 334%
Great: 435%
WDC WD40EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 165 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 163
Write 137
Mixed 116
SusWrite 164
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1
63% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 38%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 148 154 148 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 160
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 151
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
292% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MG04ACA400N 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 179 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 180
Mixed 104
SusWrite 180
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
252% 2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZRC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 42.2
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 37.1
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 122%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACR072E EI272UR
Typical Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback