Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive489% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E  (all builds)
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 08:27
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 180
2-Core 360
114% 212 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,402
126% 1,060 Pts
64-Core 1820
113% 1820 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 185
Parallax 176
167% 189 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 144
Splatting 124
126% 160 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 143%
Great: 136%
Intel UHD Graphics 750
ASRock(1849 4C8A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.3
7% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKKW010X7 1TB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2778 1454 1456 1464 1496 1512 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
489% Outstanding
Read 4,824
Write 3,970
Mixed 2,966
SusWrite 1,693
750% 3,364 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 121
415% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,642
DQ Write 1,222
DQ Mixed 1,444
1,076% 1,436 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 489%
Great: 614%
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
1.5TB free
Firmware: 003C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1859 276 63 869 1870 1867 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2440
Write 1789
Mixed 1460
SusWrite 1,134
380% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 78.9
262% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1160
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 741
696% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 303%
Great: 435%
WDC WD40EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 165 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 158
Write 158
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 164
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1.1
21% 7.13 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 38%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 154 155 155 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 174
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 154
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
312% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MG04ACA400N 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 181 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 177
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 179
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
231% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZRC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 42.1
124% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 38.5
115% 40.2 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 ACR072E EI272UR
Typical Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback