HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 07:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 140
60% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 366
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 836B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 320 337 345 366 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 334
Write 353
Mixed 330
SusWrite 340
77% 339 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 38.5
125% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 155
166% 277 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO41ED
Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback