Asrock QC5000M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000M  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 01:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5050 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 46.3
26% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 82.3
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS17437
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 302 286 291 291 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 285
Write 313
Mixed 312
SusWrite 294
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 19.3
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 132
94% 120 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 25 60 20" 1600 829 SAM0634 SMB2030N
Typical QC5000M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback