MSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C00
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221021
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 23:30
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1059
100% 829 Pts
64-Core 1613
100% 1613 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 98.7
Parallax 114
96% 110 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 109
Splatting 88.4
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 1414 1500 1593 1587 1247 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,983
Write 1627
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 1,373
357% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 41.5
183% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 592
502% 730 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 253%
Great: 352%
SHGP31-500GM 500GB
189GB free
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 794 787 807 816 845 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,739
SusWrite 1,004
424% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 84.9
280% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,183
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 1,006
753% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 295%
Great: 384%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 127 127 129 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 57.3
Write 112
Mixed 66
SusWrite 127
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 121 115 122 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 68
Write 53.8
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 119
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 27.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 44.3
SC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 52.6
76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 144 23.5" 1920 1009 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
Typical MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00) Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390M MORTAR (MS-7C00)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback