Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime22.6 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 09:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 669
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.7% Good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 79.2
76% 87.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 69.4
58% 71 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 270 129 124 121 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,606
Write 1,802
Mixed 1,676
SusWrite 410
309% 1,373 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 56.8
185% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 657
487% 651 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 176%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 33.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 75 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR0673 Acer VG240Y
Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback