Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 80%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 03:59
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 250
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 635
69% 547 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 156
Parallax 127
115% 141 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 110
Splatting 108
100% 125 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 581 615 624 606 628 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,429
Write 1,650
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 615
282% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 27.8
144% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 360
352% 571 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 167%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 23.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 165 15.5" 1280 720 CMN152A
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 74%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback