bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DN2820FYK
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 22:39
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2820-$139
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Memory 41.4
1-Core 13.8
2-Core 18.8
19% 24.7 Pts
4-Core 22
8-Core 26.7
3% 24.4 Pts
64-Core 23.7
2% 23.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 2055) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 117 103 88 90 111 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 167
Write 117
Mixed 108
SusWrite 101
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 9.2
24% 8.43 MB/s
DQ Read 53.5
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 36.4
30% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF1339.C16F 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.15% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 12 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback