Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 days ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 22:37
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 715
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 8.8
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.4% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 101
Parallax 92.2
73% 94.2 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 94.6
77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A2S8MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1137 899 388 128 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 2,373
Write 1,894
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 684
358% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 52.3
185% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 432
346% 498 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 217%
Great: 382%
SanDisk X400 128GB-$37
5GB free
Firmware: X4140000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 290
Mixed 288
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 32
106% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 205
178% 268 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
Transcend TS512GMTE110S 512GB
83GB free
Firmware: R1026E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 91 114 110 146 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,511
Write 1,306
Mixed 994
SusWrite 189
223% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 35.4
151% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 580
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 523
400% 541 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 142%
Great: 240%
PNY CS900 2TB SSD
832GB free
Firmware: CS900600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 460 462 455 427 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 461
Mixed 432
SusWrite 388
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 43.4
147% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 272
228% 331 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
244GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 163
Write 156
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 99
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 10 144 21.5" 1920 1017 VSC6F2E VA2246 SERIES
Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback