Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G5905 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 204 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 117 Parallax 120 105% 122 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 100 Splatting 86.7 87% 109 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 889GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 106 116 114 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 145 Write 115 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 110 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 79%
Exbom USB 3.0 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 443GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 127 125 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.4% Good	Read 84.3 Write 114 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 126 65% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 12GB 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.8% Very good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.8 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	15	198	28	60	18.5"	1280 720	SAM0928 T19B300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,067x
Core i5-10600KIntel $129Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	512x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	253x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	505x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	388x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	137x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	112x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	102x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16