Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 days ago, 14 days ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DU
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 21:37
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 99.9
38% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 25.7
8-Core 19.6
3% 22.7 Pts
64-Core 28.2
2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 4.3
14% 11.8 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 14.3
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,011
Write 979
Mixed 964
220% 985 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 42.9
138% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 49.1
92% 196 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
916GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 293 312 352 396 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 468
Write 407
Mixed 391
SusWrite 355
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 21.3
101% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 35.6
70% 137 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston 9905744-035.A00G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 1,097
4% 1,097 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 17.3" 1280 720 AUO479D
Typical TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_FX705DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback