Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 21:10
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 290
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1005
95% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Asus(1043 8795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 100
Parallax 97.9
84% 100 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 79.5
78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 899 382 385 353 388 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,445
Mixed 773
SusWrite 539
232% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62.4
214% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 687
622% 963 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 204%
Great: 210%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
572GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 405 444 449 454 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 469
Mixed 443
SusWrite 416
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 53.3
172% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
125GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 274 273 274 273 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 1053
Mixed 377
SusWrite 301
166% 748 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64
189% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 252
294% 507 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 157%
Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 146 143 144 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 139
Write 132
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 144
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 27" 1536 864 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback