Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 20:26
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 39
2-Core 112
46% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 266
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Sapphire(1DA2 A353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.1% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 68.9
43% 58.8 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 42
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 183 186 191 191 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 212
Write 187
Mixed 181
SusWrite 185
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 28.6
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 34.9
30% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G TIMETEC-UD3-1600 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 100 34.1" 3440 1377 SAM7119 LC34G55T
Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback