Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 23:10
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 73
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 422
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
PowerColor(148C 0560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.7% Below average
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 61.4
27% 49.6 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 40.8
38% 47 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 201 183 75 73 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 258
Write 188
Mixed 220
SusWrite 123
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 29.9
109% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 151
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
116GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 53 52 53 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 55.1
Write 47.7
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 50.7
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 37GB
4266, 33 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1920 1017 SAM071E SMBX2350
Typical X58 Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback