MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220830
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 347
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 1,324
120% 1,006 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
187% 214 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 157
Splatting 140
87% 99.3 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 388 344 373 352 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 480
Mixed 326
SusWrite 362
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 43.6
168% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 215
198% 304 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
592GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 458 391 482 485 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 486
Mixed 452
SusWrite 463
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 64.4
211% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
281% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 131%
Great: 137%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3929 4393 4241 3564 4301 4413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 2,078
Mixed 3,312
SusWrite 4,140
657% 2,884 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 107
345% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,190
892% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 494%
Great: 592%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
979GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 148 173 175 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 155
Mixed 89
SusWrite 168
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 23.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 48 240 27" 2560 1369 HPN3964 OMEN 27qs
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 1,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7C91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $539
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback