Asus PRIME A520M-E

Performance Results

Gaming 129%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 119%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-E  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 19:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 881
92% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Asus(1043 05F3) ≥ 4GB; ASUS RX7600 8GB DDR6 - DUAL-RX7600-O8G-V2
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 181
Parallax 268
121% 199 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 185
Splatting 213
171% 208 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1748 1783 1808 1826 1828 1827 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,997
Write 1,833
Mixed 1,455
SusWrite 1,804
399% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 45.5
223% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 584
520% 775 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 295%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 36.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 23.8" 1920 1017 AUS24AF ASUS VP249
Typical PRIME A520M-E Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 23%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 22%

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback