Asus PRIME A520M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-E  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 928
98% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,158
72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Asus(1043 05F3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.20.30
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 175
Parallax 267
118% 196 fps
MRender 219
Gravity 182
Splatting 208
166% 203 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1815 1816 1823 1817 1808 1792 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,013
Write 1,819
Mixed 1,459
SusWrite 1,812
399% 1,776 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 46.2
215% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 584
524% 783 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 295%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 27.4
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 23.8" 1920 1017 AUS24AF ASUS VP249
Typical PRIME A520M-E Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback