MSI B650M GAMING WIFI (MS-7E30)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive540% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E30
MotherboardMSI B650M GAMING WIFI (MS-7E30)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 195
2-Core 391
119% 226 Pts
4-Core 782
8-Core 1,108
119% 945 Pts
64-Core 1,369
85% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 122
Parallax 168
145% 156 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 141
Splatting 114
123% 157 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 130%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3571 3571 3596 3653 3654 3658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
540% Outstanding
Read 3,792
Write 3,954
Mixed 3,060
SusWrite 3,617
813% 3,606 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.2
256% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,277
DQ Write 1,696
DQ Mixed 1,429
1,220% 1,800 MB/s
Poor: 294%
This bench: 540%
Great: 648%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C30 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 67.6
MC Mixed 66.1
185% 64.6 GB/s
SC Read 54.9
SC Write 60
SC Mixed 59.7
166% 58.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 178%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 32 60 31.6" 1280 720 PHLC170 PHL 326E8F
Typical B650M GAMING WIFI (MS-7E30) Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650M GAMING WIFI (MS-7E30)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback