MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 18:17
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 178
2-Core 355
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1112
111% 901 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
MSI(1462 3896) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
182% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 245
Parallax 265
211% 256 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 220
Splatting 169
185% 236 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 182%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$64
750GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 435 436 439 438 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 433
Mixed 378
SusWrite 437
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 37
128% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 286
234% 333 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 080C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 193 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 442
Write 190
Mixed 232
SusWrite 185
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 18.7
110% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 57.2
90% 175 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 70%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
769GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2281 2221 1514 1494 1521 1525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2554
Write 2,370
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 1,759
482% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 75.3
243% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 1133
DQ Mixed 1,258
945% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 342%
Great: 410%
Asmt 2135 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 394 396 388 397 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 414
Write 398
Mixed 389
SusWrite 380
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 30
97% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 154
118% 156 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2354 2377 2373 2376 2378 2383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 1,927
Write 2,339
Mixed 2109
SusWrite 2,374
496% 2,187 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 80
248% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,467
DQ Write 1,211
DQ Mixed 1,317
992% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 359%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.6
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 240 31.5" 2560 1377 GSM7798 LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback