MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 15:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 166
2-Core 292
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 870
89% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 174
Parallax 181
150% 180 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 133
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 24 58 59 4.7 6.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 445
Write 384
Mixed 298
SusWrite 43.9
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 8
56% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 1.9
23% 56 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 58%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
20GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 117 102 118 124 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 95.3
Write 112
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 118
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
177GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 54 56 55 56 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 69
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 58.4
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
165% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 26
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 166 1 144 24.5" 1280 720 HPN3427 OMEN by HP 25
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback