Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HM
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 67.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 810
84% 678 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 141C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,431
Write 2,445
Mixed 1,753
492% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 106
359% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,047
802% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,956
Write 2,449
Mixed 2,089
486% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 89
339% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,155
882% 1,200 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 17.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 12 144 17.3" 1920 1017 AUO8294
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM_TUF706HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback