Asrock H410M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 30 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$64
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 220
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 616
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 49.9
40% 51.5 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 40
41% 51.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFQE1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 386 382 372 365 361 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 313
Mixed 303
SusWrite 375
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 31.1
140% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 168
153% 230 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 11 20 23 9.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.6% Poor
Read 60.1
Write 79.2
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 26.7
11% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 22.5
74% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 59.9
DQ Write 42.8
DQ Mixed 20.5
24% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
428GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 114 114 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 89.2
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 115
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426C16FB2/8 Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 75 23.8" 1280 720 VSC3933 VX2481-mh
Typical H410M-HVS Builds (Compare 866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback