Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 16:58
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 1,014
91% 769 Pts
64-Core 1510
94% 1510 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 153
Parallax 152
123% 152 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 130
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 244 237 230 223 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 251
Mixed 253
SusWrite 239
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41.2
162% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 232
199% 295 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
184GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1328 1351 1328 1243 1202 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,502
Write 1,500
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,289
384% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 89.3
291% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,230
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,070
808% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 318%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
15GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,609
Write 542
Mixed 1,663
351% 1,605 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 94.7
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,088
814% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
459GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 489 490 490 421 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 493
Mixed 466
SusWrite 442
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 59.6
202% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
43GB free
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 60 60 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 478
Write 348
Mixed 325
SusWrite 100
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 42.7
146% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 118
96% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 36.2
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 38.2
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 60 75" 1280 720 SNY8105 SONY TV *30
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $972
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback