MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:59
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,065
97% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 117
Parallax 118
104% 121 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.4
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
477GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 426 438 418 105 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 402
Mixed 333
SusWrite 321
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 41.8
153% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 227
192% 279 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 101%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2331 1071 441 431 459 536 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,543
Write 2,280
Mixed 2,139
SusWrite 878
439% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 80.9
287% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 1,199
895% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 297%
Great: 623%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 184 186 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 190
Mixed 120
SusWrite 182
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.6
329% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
970GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 123 125 123 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 166
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 124
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 5 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0A83 KG271U P
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback