Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:57
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$234
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 216
2-Core 416
125% 239 Pts
4-Core 768
8-Core 1,393
130% 1,080 Pts
64-Core 1,950
121% 1,950 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
Asus(1043 895B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 363
Reflection 348
Parallax 359
296% 357 fps
Gravity 290
Splatting 225
224% 258 fps
Poor: 233% Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2935 1063 943 966 968 969 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 2,939
Write 3,091
Mixed 2,972
SusWrite 1,307
580% 2,577 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 95
348% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,971
DQ Write 1,606
DQ Mixed 1,781
1,336% 1,786 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 384%
Great: 442%
Lexar NM790 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3578 4126 4132 4130 4116 3235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
612% Outstanding
Read 4,520
Write 4,678
Mixed 3,394
SusWrite 3,886
928% 4,119 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 102
366% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,055
DQ Write 1,591
DQ Mixed 1,692
1,301% 1,779 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 612%
Great: 626%
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
145GB free
Firmware: 004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 1000 999 1005 997 1000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,292
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 1037
307% 1,377 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 87.5
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 1,157
850% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 282%
Great: 302%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
154GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 550 547 548 549 548 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,922
Write 1,314
Mixed 1,224
SusWrite 606
282% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 86.7
292% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1369
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 654
618% 975 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 255%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
172% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 65.1
MC Mixed 62.2
176% 61.7 GB/s
SC Read 54.9
SC Write 65.9
SC Mixed 59.2
171% 60 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 172%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM776F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback