Lenovo 83D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83D4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:42
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 44.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 366
97% 196 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,336
125% 1,038 Pts
64-Core 2,007
124% 2,007 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Legend(17AA 3CC9) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5522
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 76.7
16% 41.6 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 51.4
37% 43.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL81T0HDLB-00BL2 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QKXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2543 2522 1903 1888 1906 1807 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 1,757
Mixed 1253
SusWrite 2,095
361% 1,589 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 95
310% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 594
522% 802 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 315%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
148% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 78.1
168% 58.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 30.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 148%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 16" 1834 1076 BOE0AC1
Typical 83D4 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback