Casper Excalibur G5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper Excalibur G5K  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Excalibur G5K
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 176
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 428
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 1501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 6.3
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 154 154 144 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 977
Mixed 688
SusWrite 178
183% 828 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 51.8
178% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 556
405% 535 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 148%
Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
345GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 98.1
Write 101
Mixed 34
SusWrite 67.9
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0533
Typical Excalibur G5K Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Casper Excalibur G5K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback