MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:26
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 849
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 136
Parallax 135
106% 134 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 120
Splatting 106
106% 133 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Sabrent ROCKET 4 1TB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,991
Write 2,388
Mixed 1,904
469% 2,094 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 77.2
255% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 1,029
769% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 447%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
238GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 476 479 300 238 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 441
SusWrite 375
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 53
180% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
351GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2171 2216 1453 1433 1452 1472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,537
Write 2363
Mixed 1,876
SusWrite 1,700
476% 2,119 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 81.9
270% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 1,000
742% 990 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 333%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
50GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 122 138 143 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 142
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 217 58 60 27" 1920 1017 ACR0ACC KG272 M
Typical MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 16,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,021
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback