Asrock B550M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive395% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 14 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock B550M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 336
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,013
104% 841 Pts
64-Core 1,388
86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 194
Parallax 197
156% 194 fps
MRender 279
Gravity 156
Splatting 117
142% 184 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 141%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3012 3025 3099 3307 1729 1890 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 3,201
Write 3,296
Mixed 2,398
SusWrite 2,677
651% 2,893 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 59.1
191% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 1011
750% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 262%
This bench: 395%
Great: 570%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 34.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 33.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 1R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 21% 52 214 56 240 27" 1920 1009 SAM727A Odyssey G40B
Typical B550M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback