MSI MS-16U7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL65 Leopard 10SFKV
MotherboardMSI MS-16U7  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 235
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 654
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5212
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 68
Parallax 68
55% 68 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 68
Splatting 68
56% 68 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 168 185 183 180 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 194
Mixed 248
SusWrite 176
89% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 41
144% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 229
186% 274 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 206%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
574GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 98 97 98 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 99.6
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 95.5
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 20.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 21% 75 72 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO80ED
Typical MS-16U7 Builds (Compare 2,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16U7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback