Lenovo 83DB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83DB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 13:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 63
1-Core 187
2-Core 373
106% 208 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,376
113% 982 Pts
64-Core 1,606
99% 1,606 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3807) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.20.28.03
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 81
45% 54.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 91.8
54% 61.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,547
Write 2,462
Mixed 1,923
515% 2,311 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 54.5
186% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 870
568% 677 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 425%
SDXC 124GB
68GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.4
Write 75.3
Mixed 74.1
60% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 7.6
1,372% 7.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 44
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 LEN9125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback