Lenovo 83BS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83BS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 22:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 35.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
68% 136 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 818
78% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 381D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.57
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.4% Poor
Lighting 27
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 47.7
22% 39.2 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 39.2
26% 30.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-1T00-1101 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 1071 1036 1444 1564 1563 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 1,266
340% 1,512 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 50
168% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 577
400% 507 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 219%
Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 30.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 16" 1280 720 LEN8986
Typical 83BS Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Lenovo 83BS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback