MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E16
MotherboardMSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 11:23
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$490
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 208
2-Core 422
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 846
8-Core 1,664
148% 1,255 Pts
64-Core 3,849
238% 3,849 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
EVGA(3842 3785) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 144
Splatting 123
111% 137 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 112%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2598
Write 2,809
Mixed 2,659
602% 2,689 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 65.5
214% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 1817
DQ Write 1,406
DQ Mixed 1,601
1,201% 1,608 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
666GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 480 483 475 483 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 443
SusWrite 480
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 55.2
185% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
142GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 280 280 278 279 280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 376
Write 279
Mixed 279
SusWrite 279
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 34.4
140% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 274
217% 304 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1698 1511 1487 1515 1484 1514 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,790
Write 2,088
Mixed 3,085
SusWrite 1,535
534% 2,374 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71
236% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,859
DQ Write 1,437
DQ Mixed 1,681
1,248% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 352%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 50.3
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.9
SC Write 59.9
SC Mixed 50.5
150% 52.4 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 147%
Great: 266%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM772A 32GK650F
Typical X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback