Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 276%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 06:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 98.9
1-Core 194
2-Core 387
121% 226 Pts
4-Core 712
8-Core 1,382
124% 1,047 Pts
64-Core 1,849
114% 1,849 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Lighting 341
Reflection 327
Parallax 349
278% 339 fps
MRender 484
Gravity 276
Splatting 221
255% 327 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 236%
Great: 235%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 41 478 1758 1759 1772 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,936
Write 1,772
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 989
344% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 39.1
165% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 1,197
DQ Mixed 706
658% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 239%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 76.1
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 72.5
204% 71.6 GB/s
SC Read 56
SC Write 62.5
SC Mixed 62.2
172% 60.2 GB/s
Latency 41.6
96% 41.6 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback