MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 06:44
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 968
91% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 112
Parallax 124
103% 121 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 114
Splatting 105
100% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 1925 1748 1805 1797 1823 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 2,561
Mixed 2,340
SusWrite 1,727
514% 2,283 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 98.6
320% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 1132
856% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 357%
Great: 526%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
263GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 267 256 257 256 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 484
Mixed 327
SusWrite 266
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51
169% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 256
215% 314 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
SSD 256GB
212GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 217 81 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 489
Write 327
Mixed 332
SusWrite 154
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 36.5
152% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 200
176% 260 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
216GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 121 120 116 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 106
Mixed 74
SusWrite 113
72% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 32.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 1R 1G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 35% 43 216 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback