Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 05:24
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 935
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 202
Parallax 192
178% 204 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 153
Splatting 126
133% 169 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 150%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 189 67 74 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 75.7
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 112
91% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 6.7
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 171
174% 298 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 107%
Great: 394%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
121GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 362 413 412 399 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 440
Mixed 417
SusWrite 374
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 51.5
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 137%
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
959GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1008 83 84 462 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,667
Write 2,217
Mixed 1,805
SusWrite 301
337% 1,498 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.5
208% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 927
686% 915 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 190%
Great: 417%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
208GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 362 426 427 423 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 433
Mixed 413
SusWrite 388
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 49.8
166% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
473GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 167 169 168 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 138
Write 147
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 166
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 1R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 26% 62 203 35 144 23.5" 1920 1017 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback