Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 days ago, 14 days ago.

System	Acer Predator G3-571 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Sienta_KLS
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '24 at 05:22
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 140 60% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 215 29% 214 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 118A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.8 4% 5.73 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 7 Splatting 6.6 6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 28 26 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 772GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 140 140 146 139 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 95.3 Write 133 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 139 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 6,230 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	68.8% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 22.5 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 19.7 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,562x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	796x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	775x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	2x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	534x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	258x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	97x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	425x
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	269x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	263x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16