Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161119
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 00:23
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 232
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 560
63% 493 Pts
64-Core 526
32% 526 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 90.3
83% 91.6 fps
MRender 81.9
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 65.3
59% 73.6 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 197
Parallax 187
175% 200 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 150
Splatting 133
125% 156 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,817
Write 1,556
Mixed 611
293% 1,328 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 48.4
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 676
521% 723 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WDC WD161KRYZ-01AGBB0 16TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 216
Write 214
Mixed 115
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 0.6
17% 6.57 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 2.7
2% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 35%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
891GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,397
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,748
463% 2,081 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 45.5
173% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 744
554% 750 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Synology BeeDrive 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: PMAP
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 334
Write 367
Mixed 272
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 26.8
82% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 64
66% 109 MB/s
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 87.2
Mixed 36.5
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$236
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 223
Write 209
Mixed 101
131% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
301% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 20.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM0F9C C49RG9x
Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback