Intel HM65

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel HM65  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 20:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 136
58% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 192
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qunion P20A 256G 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 47 49 39 47 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 516
Write 21.5
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 47.6
36% 170 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 7.1
52% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 1.5
36% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 210%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 104 97 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 88.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 101
56% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMT8G8JSC116P-PBA 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 42 60 0" 1280 720 MS_0003
Typical HM65 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel HM65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback