MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7968
MotherboardMSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 20:57
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 657
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 134
Parallax 138
101% 132 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
96% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1636 649 355 313 290 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,307
Write 1521
Mixed 1,247
SusWrite 594
263% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 61.5
189% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 669
477% 614 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 174%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
294GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 204 202 202 200 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 348
Write 352
Mixed 301
SusWrite 202
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 33.9
124% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 251
190% 255 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
384GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 206 203 204 201 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 349
Write 367
Mixed 274
SusWrite 204
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 45.9
148% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 248
187% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
107GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 467 457 404 436 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 443
Mixed 345
SusWrite 443
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 41
146% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 327
255% 351 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.9" 1280 720 ACR03FF Acer B286HK
Typical Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION(MS-7968) Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $870
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback