Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 20:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 267
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,026
91% 769 Pts
64-Core 2,041
126% 2,041 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3070 tuf gaming OC
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 203
Parallax 195
179% 206 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 148
Splatting 131
125% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$54
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 270 270 263 259 231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 1,988
Mixed 1,583
SusWrite 338
359% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 70.3
239% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 596
452% 615 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 225%
Great: 311%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
166GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 688 289 226 276 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,581
Write 2,012
Mixed 1,678
SusWrite 605
331% 1,469 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71.2
232% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 625
473% 639 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 201%
Great: 295%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
119GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 222 214 213 211 205 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 332
Write 168
Mixed 209
SusWrite 209
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 22.7
90% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 51.6
DQ Mixed 89.1
87% 144 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
156GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 129 131 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 73
SusWrite 132
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
165GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 51.9
Write 47.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 73
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 32
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 30.4
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 SAM707A LC27G5xT
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback